|
 Home
About
Us
eBay
Training
Workshops
Free
Stuff
Courses
Services
Articles/Training
Resources
Contact
Us
Systems
|
The Radiation Poisoning Of America
by Amy Worthington
Global Research, October 9, 2007
Idaho Observer - 2007-10-07
Prior to 1996, the wireless age was not coming
online fast enough, primarily because communities had the authority to
block the siting of cell towers. But the Federal Communications Act of
1996 made it nearly impossible for communities to stop construction of
cell towers "even if they pose threats to public health and the environment.
Since the decision to enter the age of wireless convenience was politically
determined for us, we have forgotten well-documented safety and environmental
concerns and, with a devil-may-care zeal that is lethally short-sighted,
we have incorporated into our lives every wireless toy that comes on the
market. We behave as if we are addicted to radiation. Our addiction to
cell phones has led to harder "drugs" like wireless Internet.
And now we are bathing in the radiation that our wireless enthusiasm has
unleashed. Those who are addicted, uninformed, corporately biased and
politically-influenced may dismiss our scientifically-sound concerns about
the apocalyptic hazards of wireless radiation. But we must not. Instead,
we must sound the alarm.
Illa Garcia wore jewelry the first day she
went back to work as a fire lookout for the state of California in the
summer of 2002. The intense radiation from dozens of RF/microwave antennas
surrounding the lookout heated the metals on her body enough to burn her
skin. "I still have those scars," she says. "I never wore
jewelry to work after that."
Likely Mountain Lookout, on U.S. Forest Service land with a spectacular
view of Mount Shasta, is one of thousands of RF/microwave "hot spots"
across the nation. A newly-erected cellular communications tower was only
30 feet from the lookout. "One antenna on that tower was even with
our heads," recalls Garcia. "We could hear high-pitched buzzing.
There were also three state communications antennas mounted on the lookout,
only 6 feet from where we walked. We climbed past them every day."
Motorola company manuals for management of communications sites confirm
that high frequency radiation from these antennas is nasty stuff. Safety
regulations mandate warning signs, EMF awareness training, protective
gear, even transmitter deactivation for personnel working that close to
antennas. Garcia and co-worker Mary Jasso were never warned about the
hazards. This, they say, demonstrates extreme malfeasance on the part
of agencies and commercial companies responsible for their exposure.
By the end of fire season, Garcia and Jasso were so ill they were forced
to retire and the lookout was closed to state personnel. Garcia, 52, is
now severely disabled with fibromyalgia, auto-immune thyroiditis and acute
nerve degeneration. Medical tests confirmed broken DNA strands in her
blood and abnormal tissue death in her brain.
Dr. Gunner Heuser, a medical specialist in neurotoxicity, states that
Garcia's disorders are a result of chronic electromagnetic field exposure
in the microwave range and that "she has become totally disabled
as a result." Dr. Heuser wrote, "In my experience patients develop
multisystem complaints after EMF exposure just as they do after toxic
chemical exposure."
Jasso, who worked the lookout for 11 seasons, is also disabled with brain
and lung damage, partial left side paralysis, muscle tremors, bone pain
and DNA damage. Jasso discovered that all lookouts who worked Likely Mountain
since 1989 are disabled. At only 61 years of age, she has lost so much
memory that she cannot remember back to when her first three children
were born. She fears that communications radiation may be a major factor
in the nation's phenomenal epidemics of dementia and autism.
Both women say they have been unjustly denied worker's comp and medical
benefits. Their pleas for help to state and federal agencies have been
fruitless. Between them they have racked up over $150,000 in medical bills,
although there is no effective treatment for radiation sickness.
Twenty-two other members of Garcia and Jasso's two families received Likely
Mountain radiation exposure. All now suffer serious and expensive illnesses,
including tumors, blood abnormalities, stomach problems, lung damage,
bone pain, muscle spasms, extreme fatigue, tremors, numbness, impaired
motor skills, cataracts, memory loss, spine degeneration, sleep problems,
low immunity to infection, hearing and vision problems, hair loss and
allergies.
Jasso's husband, who often stayed at the lookout, has a rare soft tissue
sarcoma known to be radiation related. Garcia's husband, who spent little
time at the lookout, has systemic cancer that started with sarcoma of
the colon. Garcia's daughter Teresa was at the lookout for a total of
two hours during her first pregnancy. Her daughter was born with slight
brain damage and immunity problems. "That baby was always sick,"
says Garcia. Teresa spent only three days at the lookout during her second
pregnancy. Her son was born with autism.
Garcia and Jasso have a terminal condition known as "toxic encephalopathy,"
involving brain damage to frontal and temporal lobes. This was confirmed
by SPECT brain scans. Twelve others in the two-family group who also had
the scans were diagnosed with the affliction. "All of us with this
condition have been told that we,re dying," says Garcia. "Our
mutated cells will reproduce new mutated cells until the body finally
shuts down."
Nuclear bombs on a pole
Painful conditions endured by the families of Garcia and Jasso are identical
to those suffered by Japanese victims of gamma wave radiation after nuclear
explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Five decades of studies
confirm that non-ionizing communications radiation in the RF/microwave
spectrum has the same effect on human health as ionizing gamma wave radiation
from nuclear reactions. Leading German radiation expert Dr. Heyo Eckel,
an official of the German Medical Association, states, "The injuries
that result from radioactive radiation are identical with the effects
of electromagnetic radiation. The damages are so similar that they are
hard to differentiate."1
Understanding what happened at Likely Mountain is critical to understanding
the public health threat posed by RF/microwave radiation in the United
States. The families of Garcia and Jasso, plus previous lookout workers
and multitudes of tourists who visited Likely Mountain for camping and
sightseeing, were beamed by the same kind of high frequency radiation
that blasts from tens of thousands of neighborhood cell towers and rooftop
antennas erected across America for wireless communications. The city
of San Francisco, with an area of only seven square miles, has over 2,500
licensed cell phone antennas positioned at 530 locations throughout the
city. In practical terms, this city, like thousands of others, is being
wave-nuked 24 hours a day.
The identical damage resulting from both radioactive gamma waves and high
frequency microwaves involves a pathological condition in which the nuclei
of irradiated human cells splinter into fragments called micronuclei.
Micronuclei are a definitive pre-cursor of cancer. During the 1986 nuclear
reactor disaster at Chernobyl in Russia, the ionizing radiation released
was equivalent to 400 atomic bombs, with an estimated ultimate human toll
of 10,000 deaths. Exposed Russians quickly developed blood cell micronuclei,
leaving them at high risk for cancer.
What they wouldn't tell us
RF/microwaves from cell phones and cell tower transmitters also cause
micronuclei damage in blood cells. This was reported a decade ago by Drs.
Henry Lai and Narendrah Singh, biomedical researchers at the University
of Washington in Seattle. Dr. Singh is famous for refining comet assay
techniques used to identify DNA damage. Lai and Singh demonstrated in
numerous animal studies that mobile phone radiation quickly causes DNA
single and double strand breaks at levels well below the current federal
"safe" exposure standards.2
The telecommunications industry knows this thanks to its own six-year,
wireless technology research (WTR) study program mandated by Congress
and completed in 1999. Gathering a team of over 200 doctors, scientists
and experts in the field, WTR research showed that human blood exposed
to cell phone radiation had a 300-percent increase in genetic damage in
the form of micronuclei.3 Dr. George Carlo, a public health expert who
coordinated the WTR studies, confirms that exposure to communications
radiation from wireless technology is "potentially the biggest health
insult" this nation has ever seen. Dr. Carlo believes RF/microwave
radiation is a greater threat than cigarette smoking and asbestos.
In 2000, European communications giant T-Mobile commissioned the German
ECOLOG Institute to review all available scientific evidence in regard
to health risks for wireless telecommunications. ECOLOG found over 220
peer-reviewed, published papers documenting the cancer-initiating and
cancer-promoting effects of the high frequency radiation employed by wireless
technology.4 Many corroborating studies have been published since.
By 2004, 12 research groups from seven European countries cooperating
in the REFLEX study project confirmed that microwaves from wireless communications
devices cause significant single and double strand DNA breaks in both
human and animal cells under laboratory conditions.5 In 2005, a Chinese
medical study confirmed statistically significant DNA damage from pulsed
microwaves at cell phone levels.6 That same year, University of Chicago
researchers described how pulsed communications microwaves alter gene
expression in human cells at non-thermal exposure levels.7
Because gamma waves and RF/microwave radiation are identically carcinogenic
and genotoxic to the cellular roots of life, the safe dose of either kind
of radiation is zero. No study has proven that any level of exposure from
cell-damaging radiation is safe for humans. Dr. Carlo confirms that cell
damage is not dose dependant because any exposure level, no matter how
small, can trigger damage response by cell mechanisms.8
Officials at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes
of Health closely reviewed the damning results of WTR studies, which also
revealed microwave damage to the blood brain barrier. But these officials
have chosen to downplay, obfuscate and even deny the irrepressible science
of the day. Raking in $billions from selling spectrum licenses, the feds
have allowed the telecom industry to unleash demonstrably dangerous technology
which induces millions of people to become brain-intimate with improperly
tested wireless devices9 and which saturates the nation with carcinogenic
waves to service those devices. Dr. Carlo says that even the American
Cancer Society is in bed with the communications industry, which infuses
the Society with substantial contributions.10
Two ways to die
Medical science illustrates that there are two ways to die from radiation
poisoning: Fast burn and slow burn. Nuclear flash-burned Japanese had
parts of their flesh melt off before they died in agony within hours or
days. People have also quickly died after walking through powerful radar
beams, which can microwave-cook internal organs within seconds of exposure.
Slow-burn radiation mechanisms are cumulative, progressive, ongoing and
continual. Thousands of Japanese nuke bomb victims died painfully years
after exposure. The slow burn process of RF/microwave exposure is manifested
by cancer clusters commonly found in communities irradiated by cell tower
transmitters. Recent Swedish epidemiological studies confirm that, after
2,000 hours of cellular phone exposure, or a latency period of about 10
years, brain cancer risk rises by 240 percent.11
Communications antennas now blast the human habitat with many different
electromagnetic frequencies simultaneously. Human DNA hears this energetic
cacophony loud and clear, reacting like the human ear would to high volume
country music, R&B plus rock and roll screaming from the same speaker.
Irradiated cells struggle to protect themselves against this destructive
dissonance by hardening their membranes. They cease to receive nourishment,
stop releasing toxins, die prematurely and spill micronuclei fragments
into a sort of "tumor bank account." This is precisely how microwave
radiation prematurely ages living tissues.
Nuking the crew
The constant roaming pain is intense for 32-year-old Kenneth Hurtado of
Southern California. He's been to hell and back, starting with a seven-pound
tumor on a kidney, diagnosed in 2002. The cancer spread to his brain.
His first brain tumor was removed by craniotomy, the second by the cyber
knife. In 2005, cancer nodes were found in his lungs. By 2006, the cancer
had metastasized to his legs. This year he is battling three excruciating
tumors on his spinal cord. Hurtado hates his seizures. His last one came
on while he was driving. "It's like the devil taking over your body,"
he says.
Now unable to work, Hurtado says he was relatively healthy in 1998 when
he began a career as an installer for a large international corporation
manufacturing electronics equipment for wireless providers. At the base
of cell towers there is an equipment "hut" where installers
assemble the radios, amplifiers and filters which generate man-made microwave
frequencies and route them up to transmitter antennas through huge cables.
Mounted on sector supports aptly named alpha, beta and gamma, the antennas
send and receive these carcinogenic radio waves and their pulsed data
packets at the speed of light.
Posted on locked fences around the huts are "danger" warning
signs. Hurtado says, "You look around these sites and you find many
dead birds on the gravel. They can't take the radiation and they,ll just
die. You don't have to ponder that too long to figure it's bad."
Hurtado doesn't know how much radiation he got on the job. He says there
are at least four connection spots inside the hut where radiation can
leak. He could not avoid the "heat" when he turned the radios
on for testing and he wonders if his cancer is the result. "When
I first got hired, we had safety meetings, but they pretty much minimized
the hazards," he remembers. He was issued no electromagnetic safety
clothing and it was not until 2002 that he got a radiation meter to wear.
"The meter is supposed to warn you if you are getting too much radiation,"
he says, "but I put mine on a stick and placed it next to antennas
and the alarm never went off."
A medical report in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental
Health confirms that workers exposed to high levels of RF/microwave radiation
routinely have astronomical cancer rates.12 The report notes that, for
these workers, the latency period between high radiation exposure and
illness is short compared to less exposed populations.
Hurtado says there are many industry workers who are dangerously over-exposed.
"I've talked to guys on power crews who have to climb around the
antennas and they,ve told me that before a work day is half over, they
start feeling really sick." He adds, "In my mind they are getting
cooked."
Hurtado suspects that, since the early days of the wireless buildout,
there has been illegal activity related to public exposure from transmission
sites. "I'm pretty sure," he says, "that some of the carriers
are exceeding FCC exposure limits. They can turn the radios and amplifiers
up to get a bigger footprint and they don't care if the alarms go on once
the installers are gone." Regulatory inspectors could identify violators
because channels can be spectrum analyzed. "But," he says, "there
is just no one to check and I believe that the public is getting way too
much radiation now."
Regulators asleep at the wheel
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the single agency with authority
to regulate the broadcast/communications industry, has neither money,
manpower nor motive to properly monitor radiation output from hundreds
of thousands of commercial wireless installations spewing carcinogenic
waves across the nation. The FCC admits that physical testing to verify
compliance with emissions guidelines is relatively rare.
Critics say that FCC appointees, with virtually no medical or public health
expertise, represent an old-boy network and a cheering squad for the telecommunications
and broadcast industries. The Center for Public Integrity found that FCC
officials have been bribed by the industries with such perks as expensive
trips to Las Vegas.13
Dr. Carlo confirms that there is no regulatory accountability. He says,
"You have to go to those base stations and independently measure
what is coming out of them because we have had many instances where you
have an antenna that is allowed by law to transmit at 100 watts and we
have seen up to 900 to 1000 watts. You can turn things up when nobody
is looking."14
Neighborhood groups monitoring the broadcast/communications antenna farm
on Lookout Mountain near Denver, Colorado, have consistently found that,
despite protests to the FCC over nine years, radiation on the mountain
has been measured at up to 125 percent of exposure levels permitted by
federal law.15
Lethal exposure guidelines
Even if there were reliable compliance monitoring, many experts say that
FCC public exposure guidelines for RF/microwave radiation are deadly because
they are based on the obsolete and unfounded theory that only power density
hot enough to flash-cook tissues is harmful. This puts FCC at odds with
current scientific knowledge regarding the minimum exposure level at which
harm to living cells begins.
Myriad symptoms of radiation poisoning can be induced at exposure levels
hundreds, even thousands of times lower than current standards permit.
Russia's public exposure standards are 100 times more stringent than ours
because Russian scientists have consistently shown that, at U.S. exposure
levels, humans develop pathological changes in heart, kidney, liver and
brain tissues, plus cancers of all types.16
Norbert Hankin, chief of the EPA's Radiation Protection Division, has
stated that the FCC's exposure guidelines are protective only against
effects arising from a thermal (flash burn) mechanism. He concedes that,
"the generalization by many, that these guidelines protect human
beings from harm by any and all mechanisms, is not justified."17
Thus, public microwave exposure levels tolerated by the FCC and its industry-loaded
advisory committees are a national health disaster. Yet, for pragmatic
and lucrative reasons, federal exposure limits have been deliberately
set so high that no matter how much additional wireless radiation is added
to the national burden, it will always be "within standards."
The FCC regulatory mess comes into focus with the Likely Mountain case.
Jasso says that when she and Garcia contacted the FCC regarding their
radiation injuries, they were met with an appalling lack of expertise
and concern. "FCC has no answers," Jasso says. "Their exposure
guidelines are convoluted and nonsensical. They refuse to address problems
of multiple antennas, field expansion, human body coupling and blood reversal
because they want to avoid regulatory problems at telecommunication sites."
She adds, "FCC will fine a licensee thousands of dollars for not
having a light installed on top of a telecommunications tower, but they
have not issued even a warning letter to their licensees for the injuries
that occurred on Likely Mountain. They say injury cannot occur because
their licensees are regulated."
Catch 22
When Garcia and Jasso filed suit against companies operating microwave
transmitters on Likely Mountain, they could find no attorney who would
take their case and they were forced to proceed pro se. In August, 2007,
a California district court denied their claim, mainly on the grounds
that they had not proven that the defendants had exceeded FCC exposure
guidelines. Under federal law the shattered health of 24 people, plus
medical testimony, is not sufficient proof of negligence and liability.
Since FCC provides no enforcement monitoring at transmitter sites and
since the radiation industry is not required to prove with consistent
documentation that it is compliant, injured parties have little chance
of proving non-compliance because the damage to their health often becomes
obvious months or even years after their exposure.
The court worried that the Garcia-Jasso case highlights "the conflict
between the FCC's delegated authority to establish RF radiation guidelines
and limits and plaintiffs, attempt to establish that wireless facilities
like the one at Likely Mountain are ultrahazardous."So, while current
science provides ample evidence that FCC's guidelines are ultrahazardous,
the radiation industry hides behind FCC incompetence, simply because FCC
retains exclusive authority to set the standards.
The FCC's disastrous authority is calcified by the Telecommunications
Act (TCA) of 1996. The telecom industry is infamous for lavish "donations"
which keep legislators on its leash. Anticipating a national radiation
health crisis and the public backlash that would follow, the telecom lobby
blatantly bought itself a provision in the law that prohibits state and
local governments from considering environmental (health) effects when
siting personal wireless service facilities so long as "...such facilities
comply with the FCC's regulations concerning such emissions." Many
say the TCA insures that America's war on cancer will never be won, while
protecting gross polluters from liability.
On our own
After passage of the TCA, a group of scientists and engineers, backed
by the Communications Workers of America, filed suit in federal court.
They hoped the Supreme Court would review both the FCC's outdated exposure
guidelines and the legality of a federal law that severely impedes state
and local authority in the siting of hazardous transmitters. In 2001,
the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. The group's subsequent petition
to the FCC asking the agency to bring its exposure guidelines current
with the latest scientific data was denied.18
This is where we stand today. The public has no vote, no voice, no choice.
Chronic exposure to scientifically indefensible levels of DNA-ravaging
radiation is now compulsory for everyone in America. This is why Garcia
and Jasso are ill today; this why the industry enjoys unchallenged power
to place dangerous transmitters in residential and commercial areas with
unsafe setbacks and this is why untold thousands of Americans in buildings
with transmitters on the roof are given no safety warnings, though they
work and dwell in carcinogenic electromagnetic fields. In the meantime,
the radiation industry rakes in $billions in quarterly profits, none of
which is set aside for to pay for the national health catastrophe at hand.
Every citizen is now condemned to protect and defend himself against radiation
assault as best he can. There have been a number of lawsuits against the
radiation industry since cell towers began going up in backyards across
the nation. In 2001, a group action lawsuit was filed in South Bend, Indiana,
by families living in close proximity to towers. The complaint describes
health effects suffered by the plaintiffs, including heart palpitations,
interference with hearing, recurring headaches, short term memory loss,
sleep disturbances, multiple tumors, glandular problems, chronic fatigue,
allergies, weakened immune system, miscarriage and inability to learn.19
The South Bend suit was settled out of court on the basis of nuisance
and decreased property values. Health claims don't hold water if emissions
are within FCC exposure standards. This case is valuable for understanding
the lunacy of FCC standards. The sick families enlisted the help of radiation
consultant Bill Curry, who honed his expertise as an engineer for Argonne
and Livermore labs. Dr. Curry found that one of the towers was irradiating
homes at over 65 microwatts per square centimeter.20 This power density
is well within federal exposure standards, which allow any neighborhood
to be zapped with at least 580 microwatts per square centimeter, or higher,
depending on the frequencies. If the families were sick at 65 microwatts/cm2
what would they be at 580? Considering that the Soviets used furtive Cold
War microwave bombardment to make US embassy personal radiation-sick at
an average exposure level of only .01 microwatts/cm2, America's clear
and present danger is obvious.21
How radiation sick is America?
Since the wireless revolution began wave-nuking the U.S. in the 1990s,
there have been no federally funded health studies to assess the cumulative
effects of ever-increasing communications radiation on public health.
There is no national database enabling citizens to study the location
of transmitters in their areas. Local and state governments can offer
no information on how much commercial wireless radiation is contaminating
their populations. When trying to find out who owns a tower or which companies
have transmitters on that tower, citizens usually hit a brick wall.
Dr. Carlo heads the only independent, post-market health surveillance
registry in the nation where people can report radiation illness. 22 Dr.
Carlo says the registry has heard from thousands of people who believe
that their illnesses, including brain and eye cancers, are due to telecommunications
radiation from both wireless phones and tower transmitters. In the last
two years, the registry has seen an upsurge in reports as transmitters
become ever more energetically dangerous in order to accommodate increased
data flow for new, multi-media technologies.
We can only guess how many Americans are in their graves today from microwave
assault. Arthur Firstenberg, who founded the Cellular Phone Task Force,
wrote that, on November 14, 1996, New York City's first digital cellular
provider activated thousands of PCS antennae newly erected on the rooftops
of apartment buildings. Health authorities reported that a severe and
lingering flu hit the city that same week. In response to its classified
newspaper ad advising that radiation sickness is similar to flu, the Task
Force heard back from hundreds of people who reported sudden onset symptoms
synchronous to microwave startup"symptoms similar to stroke, heart
attack and nervous breakdown.
Firstenberg then gathered statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and analyzed weekly mortality statistics published for 122 U.S.
cities. Each of dozens of cities recorded a 10-25 percent increase in
mortality, lasting two to three months, beginning in the week during which
that city's first digital cell phone network began commercial service.
Cities with no cellular system start up in the same time period showed
no abnormal increases in mortality. 23
Studies abroad
Recent health surveys in other nations confirm that people living close
to wireless transmitters are in big trouble:
In 2002, French medical specialists found that people living close to
cell towers suffered extreme sleep disruption, chronic fatigue, nausea,
skin problems, irritability, brain disturbances and cardiovascular problems.24
German researchers found that people living within 1,200 feet of a transmitter
site in the German city of Naila had a high rate of cancer and developed
their tumors on average eight years earlier than the national average.
Breast cancer topped the list.25
Spanish researchers found that people living within 1,000 feet of cellular
antennas had statistically significant illness at an average power density
of 0.11 to 0.19 microwatts /cm2, which is thousands of times less than
allowed by international exposure standards.26
An Egyptian medical study found that people living near mobile phone base
stations were at high risk for developing nerve and psychiatric problems,
plus debilitating changes in neurobehavioral function. Exposed persons
had significantly lower performance on tests for attention, short term
auditory memory and problem solving.27
Researchers in Israel studied people in the town of Netanya who had lived
near a cell tower for 3-7 years. They had a cancer rate four times higher
than the control population. Breast cancer was most prevalent. 28
Europe in an uproar
A new European Union poll of more than 27,000 people across the continent
reveals that 76 percent of respondents feel that they are being made ill
by wireless transmitters.29 Seventy-one percent in the UK believe they
suffer health effects from mast (cell tower) radiation. In April 2007,
The London Times reported a startling number of cancer clusters in mast
neighborhoods. One study in Warwickshire, found 31 cancers around a single
street. 30 Some sick Brits send their blood to a lab in Germany, which
uses state of the art methodology to confirm wireless radiation damage.
Radiation sickness is now so prevalent in Germany that 175 doctors have
signed the Bramberger Appeal, a document calling the situation a "medical
disaster." It asks the German government to initiate a national public
health investigation. This appeal closely follows the Freiburger Appeal,
signed by thousands of German doctors who say they are dealing with an
epidemic of severe and chronic diseases among both old and young patients
exposed to wireless microwave radiation. The head of the cancer registry
in Berlin found that one urban area with cellular antennas had a breast
cancer rate seven times the national average.31
Sweden was one of the first nations to go wireless. Swedish neuroscientist,
Dr. Olle Johansson, with hundreds of published papers to his credit, says
that a national epidemic of illness and disability was unleashed by the
wireless revolution. Long periods of sick leave, attempted suicides and
industrial accidents all increased simultaneously with introduction of
mobile phone radiation. Ninety-nine percent of the Swedish population
is now under duress of powerful third generation masts. Johansson reports
that people are plagued with sleep disorders, chronic fatigue that does
not respond to rest, difficulties with cognitive function and serious
blood problems. Recurrent headaches and migraines are a "substantial
public health problem," he says.32
Rooftop transmitters, which readily pass microwave radiation into structures,
can be a death sentence. Across the world there are reports of cancer
clusters and extreme illness in office buildings and multi-tenant dwellings
where antennas are placed on rooftops directly over workers and tenants.
In 2006, the top floors of a Melbourne University office building were
closed after a brain tumor cluster drew media attention to the risks of
communications transmitters on top of the building.33 Likewise, ABC's
Brisbane television complex, topped with satellite dishes and radio antennas,
was the site of a well-publicized breast cancer cluster among workers.34
Deadlier death rays
In the meantime, the radiation cowboys of America are having a good ol
time because they know there's no sheriff in town. The commercial wireless
industry is relentless in its drive to construct thousands of new transmitter
sites in neighborhoods and schoolyards everywhere, while adding more powerful
antennas at its older sites. Countless WiFi systems, both indoors and
out, accommodate wireless laptop computers, personal digital assistants,
WiFi-enabled phones, gaming devices, video cameras, even parking and utility
meters. Hundreds of cities already have or are planning to fund WiFi networks,
each consisting of thousands of small microwave transmitters bolted to
buildings, street lamps, park benches and bus stops. Some networks are
being buried under sidewalks. These access points or "nodes"
blast carcinogenic energy at 2.4 to 5 gigahertz with virtually no warning
signs about radiation exposure. WiFi radiation is unregulated by the FCC.
Sprint-Nextel and Clearwire are now rolling out in U.S. cities tower-mounted
WiMAX transmitters providing wireless internet access "to die for."
WiMAX is WiFi on steroids. Upon startup of WiMAX transmitters near the
Swedish village of Gotene, the emergency room at the local hospital was
flooded by calls from people overcome with pulmonary and cardiovascular
symptoms.35
WiMAX radiation could one day be cranked up to a bone-incinerating 66
gigahertz.36 A single WiMAX tower could provide internet coverage for
an area of 3,000 square miles, although coverage for 6-25 square miles
is the norm now. Promoters say WiMAX may some day replace all cable and
DSL broadband services and irradiate virtually all rural areas. Yet, not
a single environmental or public health study has been required as the
industry unleashes infrastructure for this savage new wireless technology
from which no living flesh will escape.
The commercial ray-peddlers are not alone in their quest to make the U.S.
a radiation wasteland. In August, 2007, Congress approved new Homeland
Security legislation which funds a program to "promote communications
compatibility between local, state and federal officials." We catch
a glimpse of what this portends as the state of New York gears up to erect
hundreds of new wireless installations for a "Statewide Wireless
Network (SWN)." This system will blanket 97 percent of the state,
allowing agencies at various government levels to communicate instantly
while greatly adding to the fog of commercial wireless pollution.37 The
New York Office for Technology says that the radiation power densities
of the system will be within FCC limits. That assurance should give us
the shivers.
Angela's story
Angela Flynn, a 43-year-old caregiver, lives in Santa Cruz, California.
Last spring she took classes at a local church where wireless antennas
were concealed in a chimney on the building. She recalls, "Every
muscle in my body felt sore. And my joints were feeling creaky. My instructor
mentioned how people at the women's center on church property had similar
symptoms. During my sixth day I had a severe reaction. My short term memory
was gone and I was disoriented and confused. When the instructor asked
a question, I could not recall anything from the lecture."
At night, Angela could not sleep and she would lie awake, feeling her
body buzz. She became hypersensitive to other sources of electromagnetic
radiation. The symptoms became so bothersome that she canceled the rest
of her course. Using a chart for calculating cumulative, non-ionizing,
electromagnetic radiation exposure levels, she found that the classes
"located only 100 feet from antennas in the building" had suffered
the highest possible exposure during peak operation. "It took a month
before I regained my health," she reports.
When Angela wrote letters to the church inquiring whether it was monitoring
the health of the people exposed to antenna radiation, church officials
were "unresponsive and dismissive." So Angela saw the light.
She helped organize a community group to put pressure on county officials
for answers. After hearing community testimony, officials directed the
zoning department to create a comprehensive map of county transmitter
sites and to put together a report on emissions testing.
Angela says, "We recently had a delay of an installation of a tower
near a middle school. The superintendent has even come out against the
tower and was instrumental in delaying the hearing on the site. He also
arranged a school board meeting on the issue." Angela's efforts to
share critical information with her community made a difference.
Conclusion
America must soon face its radiation cataclysm. The EMR Network says that
millions of workers occupy worksites on a daily basis where operating
antenna arrays are camouflaged and where no RF safety program is carried
out. Thanks to shameless predatory advertising techniques, American youth
are now literally addicted to "texting," watching TV and accessing
the Internet on tiny wireless screens. These are the toys that keep cell
towers and WiFi hot spots buzzing. A nation that requires compulsory mass
irradiation to fuel its trivial entertainment needs is surely destined
to have a sickly and short-lived population.
Right now, 11.7 million Americans have been diagnosed with cancer. Because
humans can harbor cancer conditions for years before detection, additional
millions of cancer victims are yet undiagnosed. The Journal of Oncology
Practice predicts that, by 2020, there will be so many cancer cases in
the U.S. that doctors may not be able to cope with their caseloads. The
report concludes the nation could soon face a shortage of up to 4,000
cancer specialists.38
A recent CBS news series on the raging American cancer epidemic left viewers
with the mindset that trainloads of federal cash must flow if we are to
find the cancer answer. But a proven cancer initiator now inundates our
cities, roadways, schools, offices and homes. Any environmental stressor
that jackhammers human cells at millions to billions of cycles per second
is a cancer factor. Any wave-pollution that breaks the DNA and causes
pre-cancerous micronuclei in human blood is a cancer factor. Logic tells
us that there will be no "answer to cancer" until we eliminate
the cancer factors.
Wireless communications radiation is to America today what DDT, thalidomide,
dioxin, benzene, Agent Orange and asbestos were yesterday. Historically,
the truth about the public health menace of extreme toxins is never told
until thousands sicken and die.
Dr. Robert Becker, noted for decades of research on the effects of electromagnetic
radiation, has warned: "Even if we survive the chemical and atomic
threats to our existence, there is the strong possibility that increasing
electropollution could set in motion irreversible changes leading to our
extinction before we are even aware of them. All life pulsates in time
to the earth and our artificial fields cause abnormal reactions in all
organismsThese energies are too dangerous to entrust forever to politicians,
military leaders and their lapdog researchers." 39
Our mission to save the nation's health and restore sanity in the wireless
age seems daunting. The wireless juggernaut is an aggressive, mean machine.
Federal regulators are clearly compromised and incompetent to protect
the public health. Uninformed consumers dearly love their magic digital
toys and don't yet understand the connection between those toys and a
national raging cancer epidemic that may consume us all.
Powerful economic interests have lied to us long enough. Americans deserve
the facts. We need dialogue. Wireless radiation is a form of electronic
trespass. America must decide whose rights are more important"idlers
beaming death rays for piddling gibberish or the elderly with pacemakers
who are made ill by cell phone and tower radiation wherever they go. Must
we all prematurely perish so that wireless enthusiasts can capture cell
phone photos and instantly send them for processing via carcinogen express?
Must all neighborhoods become sick zones so that radiation addicts can
receive recipes, ads and other frivolous text messages on their cell phone
toys? Does a human being have the right to NOT be forcibly WiMAXED into
a coffin, or do only wireless providers and their devotees have rights?
What can we do?
We can commit to join the growing radiation awareness movement and continue
educating ourselves and others. We can employ digital and audio radiation
detectors to help safeguard our personal health and to demonstrate the
ceaseless brutality of ubiquitous wireless radiation which threatens the
genetic integrity of future generations. We can promote emerging technologies
that could make communications technologies safer.
We can demand that federal radiation exposure standards and setback requirements
be updated to reflect the realities of modern science. Federal communications
law must be rewritten so that local jurisdictions can regain their right
to consider health and environment when reviewing wireless siting applications.
We can insist that wireless emissions from transmitters be drastically
reduced as they are in Austria and Russia. We can demand routine compliance
testing at all transmitter sites. We can see to it that people who have
been living and working near powerful transmitters be given opportunity
to report their resulting illnesses in national surveys. Proper epidemiological
studies must be conducted and their results published and broadly disseminated.
Each of us can break the seductive, but oppressive wireless habit ourselves.
We can play no game, use no wireless Internet system, make no trivial
phone call that necessitates enlarging America's dense forest of wireless
transmitters. If no one buys WiMAX-enabled devices and related services,
this dangerous system will fail.
Whenever possible, we can go back to the old-fashioned, corded phones
and message machines which made yesteryear a far more healthy time. Cordless
household and office phones emit powerful megahertz or gigahertz microwave
radiation, causing damage to hearing, eyesight and brain function. DECT
cordless phones irradiate a huge area even when not in use. We can encourage
others to contact us by conventional land line phones only. Can we enjoy
a leisurely conversation knowing that an irradiated caller risks disease
and disability for mindless chatter? What good is wireless convenience
if it means being ultimately tethered to a hospital bed? We can teach
our children that health is more important than passing convenience and
instant gratification.
According to OSHA, no environment should be deliberately made hazardous.
Backed by current scientific knowledge, we can refuse to work or shop
in an environment which endangers our health. We can demand that megahertz
and gigahertz cordless phones, walkie talkie radios, WLAN and WiFi systems
be removed from schools, offices, hospitals and any public place where
people are grossly irradiated without their informed consent. Second hand
smoke is bad; second hand radiation is worse.
We wish to thank the courageous radiation victims interviewed for this
report who have generously revealed the details of their personal suffering
in order to warn others. Following their example, we must continue undaunted
in the moral quest to protect the national health and restore the world
to sanity before it is too late.
Meters and resources
The Electrosmog Detector allows you to HEAR the intensity of RF/microwave
pollution in your environment. Developed by British radiation expert Alasdair
Phillips, this battery-operated device will quickly allow you to identify
dangerous RF/microwave hotspots, even where transmitters are concealed,
and take action to protect yourself. This meter is $99 (price includes
shipping) and can be obtained from HEARING IS BELIEVING, Box 64 Hayden,
Idaho 83835. E-mail: gzz@icehouse.net.
The Trifield Meter ($145), produced by Alpha Lab, is used mainly to measure
the milligauss of electromagnetic fields coming from 60 hertz sources.
Use this digital meter to make sure your living and working spaces are
under 2 milligauss. Alpha Lab's Microwave Power Density Meter ($320) is
a more sensitive digital microwave meter that will help you assess the
kilohertz, megahertz and gigahertz radiation in our wireless environment.
This easy-read meter measures microwave radiation in microwatts per cm2,
allowing comparison of your readings to the power density used by the
Russians to make our embassy staff sick. Remember, people inside the embassy
reportedly received only about .01 microwatts per cm2. For more information,
contact Alpha Lab Inc., 1280 South 300 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101;
(800) 658-7030; www.trifield.com
Alan Broadband produces radiation detection devices with models ranging
in price from $159 to $2,800. The $159 model, while not giving detailed
readings, is an extremely sensitive and sturdy instrument that gives an
accurate dial read on whether or not radiation is present and its relative
intensity. It lets you know when you are being irradiated and serves as
an excellent tool to illustrate exposure levels to others. For more information,
contact Alan Broadband 93 Arch St., Redwood City, California 94062; (888)
369-9627; www.zapchecker.com
Books
Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo and
Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001.
Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette, Robert C. Kane, Vantage Press, 2001.
Cell Towers: Wireless Convenience or Environmental Hazard? The Berkshire-Litchfield
Environmental Council, Edited by B. Blake Levitt, 2000. Order from Barnes
and Noble.
Websites
These websites provide excellent information on all aspects of health
and other issues relating to electromagnetic fields and radio frequency/microwave
radiation.
www.buergerwelle.com This excellent German (but in English) site features
RF/microwave radiation news from all over the world. The science keeps
pouring in and this is where to find it, along with lots of human interest.
www.cprnewsbureau.org This is an excellent source of up-to-date news on
wireless issues.
www.emrnetwork.org This site has superb resources organized by professionals
with expertise in all facets of our RF/microwave radiation problem.
www.safewireless.org This site features Dr. Carlo's Mobil Telephone Health
Concerns Registry where people can report ill health effects from living
near microwave transmitters or from the use of wireless devices. It also
features great news reports.
www.microwavenews.com This is home to Microwave News, an excellent monthly
publication. It offers cutting edge science reports, plus a great archive.
www.sageassociates.net This site provides valuable information on how
to make homes and offices safer in the wireless age.
CAUTION: There are many devices on the market claiming to protect wireless
users from radiation. These include: air tube headsets, ferrite bead clip-ons
and an array of paste-ons advertised to cut down on thermal effects or
deflect negative energy. Energy testing, kinesiology and meter readings
indicate that these mitigation devices DO NOT adequately protect against
the brutal force of near field microwave radiation. You can investigate
the effectiveness of these devices by metering radiation levels while
using them. If radiation pours from your "safe" headset, don't
bank your life on it. If practiced in the art of kinesiology, you can
also "muscle test" the effectiveness of the radiation mitigation
device. The human body becomes very weak when irradiated with any man-made
frequency, especially microwaves. If a protective device is really working,
you will not detect muscle weakness when the body is near a transmitting
wireless phone or gadget.
OUR BEST TIP: If you want a safe household phone, find an AT&T corded
speaker phone 950, available at most large office supply stores. It emits
no microwave radiation, holds up to heavy use, has a great digital display
screen and allows hands-free conversation.
NOTES
1. Interview with Dr. Eckel was published by Schwabischen Post 12-07-06.
Find this interview at www.heseproject.org. See "The Cell Nucleus
is Mutating."
2. "Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation,"
a paper presented by Dr. Lai to the Mobile Phones and Health Symposium,
October 25-28, 1998, University of Vienna. Also "DNA Damage and Cell
Phone Radiation," www.rfsafe.com, 11-02-05.
3. Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age, Dr. George Carlo
and Martin Schram, Carroll & Graf Publishers, 2001, p.151.
4. "Mobile Telecommunications and Health"Summary of the ECOLOG
study for T-Mobile, 2000," Find this summary at www.hese-project.org.
5. "Cell Phone Radiation Harms DNA, Study Claims," (Reuters)
MSNBC, 12-04-04. Also "Mobile Phone Radiation Harms DNA," R.
Moss, CPR News Bureau, 10-16-06.
6. "RF-Induced DNA Breaks Reported in China," Microwave News,
09-29-05. This report comes from the Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
7. "2.45 GHz radiofrequency fields alter gene expression in cultured
human cells," Lee S. et al, Department of Medicine, University of
Chicago, PubMed 16107253.
8. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast Review,"
a public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this excellent
dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
9. Few Americans know that cell phones have never been safety tested thanks
to the FDA, which exempted cell phones from pre-market testing based on
a "low power exclusion" rule.
10. "The American Cancer Society is Misleading the Public,"
Dr. George Carlo, 8-5-07. Find this statement at www.buergerwelle.com.
11. "Long-Term Mobile Phone Use Raises Brain Tumor Risk: Study,"
Reuters, 03-31-06. This research was conducted by the Swedish National
Institute for Working Life whose scientists studied 905 people with malignant
brain tumors to confirm a 240% increased risk of brain tumors after heavy
mobile phone use.
12. "Cancer in Radar Technicians Exposed to RF/Microwave Radiation:
Sentinel Episodes," Richter E. et al, Int. J. Occup Environ Health
6 (3):187-193, 2000.
13. "FCC Lives Large off Lobbyist Bribes," Capitol Hill Blue,
05-22-03, capitolhillblue.com.
14. "Health Social Services and Housing Sub-Panel Telephone Mast
Review," public discussion by Dr. George Carlo, 2-26-07. Find this
excellent dissertation at www. safewireless.org.
|
|
